- Tomahawks and Touchdowns: Week #8 Preview
- The Lucha Lowdown (Season 4, Episode 18)
- Broncos Battle Chiefs
- The Burgundy Breakdown
- Bucs Win in Overtime
- Total Diva Fallout (Episodes 8.04 and 8.05)
- Women’s Wrestling Wrap-Up
- A Much Needed Change
- Is Panthers’ D-Line To Blame For Shoddy Run Defense?
- The 2nd Mae Young Classic Quarterfinals Preview
- Sean McDermott’s Head Coaching Tenure Is Becoming Worrisome
- 3 Impacts From Impact (Bound For Glory Edition)
- Tomahawks and Touchdowns: Week #7 Preview
- The Lucha Lowdown (Season 4, Episode 19)
- Goin’ to Work: Opening Night Takeaways For The Detroit Pistons
Saber-Metrics Sunday: Is it Cool to use WHIP?
- Updated: August 28, 2016

Baseball fans and analysts often use the term, “bailed (insert player(s)) out.” The context of said term is used in several situations in a baseball game; one in particular is when a pitcher puts a lot of guys on base, but escapes with minimal or no run damage. It can happen in several ways: a pitcher can make great pitches to escape, a great defensive play can be made or the opposing offense can make bad decisions at the plate.
When a pitcher does that often, their pitching abilities are questioned as to how good they really are. As good as say FIP or xFIP is, it still may not tell the complete story of how efficient a pitcher is at keeping guys off the base paths. Not sure what FIP is here is our article on that. Pitchers may be able to prevent runs, but do they allow a lot of base runners? If they do, it can lead to more pitches, which not only makes them labor more it also obviously decreases their efficiency.
This leads to the statistic known as WHIP (Walks plus Hits per Innings Pitched). This stat simply measures how many runners pitchers put on base. Runs are not measured in any way in this stat, it only sticks to base runners. It is not considered a traditional statistic, however it is used and more well known than other advanced stats. Many baseball broadcasts include WHIP on their stat graphics as do MLB ballparks these days.
Formula:
WHIP = (BB + H)/IP
RK | Player | Team | W | L | ERA | G | GS | SV | SVO | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | AVG | WHIP▲ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Scherzer, M | WSH | 14 | 7 | 2.92 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 182.0 | 125 | 61 | 59 | 25 | 44 | 227 | .191 | 0.93 |
2 | Hendricks, K | CHC | 12 | 7 | 2.19 | 25 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 152.0 | 114 | 45 | 37 | 13 | 38 | 135 | .207 | 1.00 |
3 | Sale, C | CWS | 15 | 7 | 3.14 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 177.2 | 140 | 64 | 62 | 19 | 38 | 179 | .216 | 1.00 |
4 | Verlander, J | DET | 14 | 7 | 3.33 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 181.0 | 138 | 71 | 67 | 23 | 46 | 189 | .209 | 1.02 |
5 | Teheran, J | ATL | 3 | 9 | 3.15 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 145.2 | 118 | 54 | 51 | 18 | 32 | 128 | .219 | 1.03 |
6 | Arrieta, J | CHC | 16 | 5 | 2.62 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 161.2 | 106 | 49 | 47 | 11 | 62 | 158 | .183 | 1.04 |
7 | Lackey, J | CHC | 9 | 7 | 3.41 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 158.1 | 122 | 63 | 60 | 19 | 43 | 156 | .217 | 1.04 |
8 | Bumgarner, M | SF | 12 | 8 | 2.44 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 180.2 | 142 | 59 | 49 | 20 | 47 | 202 | .212 | 1.05 |
9 | Kluber, C | CLE | 14 | 8 | 3.07 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 175.2 | 140 | 66 | 60 | 16 | 44 | 178 | .218 | 1.05 |
10 | Porcello, R | BOS | 17 | 3 | 3.23 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 172.2 | 153 | 69 | 62 | 20 | 28 | 145 | .234 | 1.05 |
The main question is though, how reliable is this stat? Well, there are pros and cons.
The Cons:
-Though it gives you an idea of how often a pitcher gives up base runners, the hits part of the equation goes back to the BABIP aspect of baseball. And if you need a refresher course on the concept of BABIP read our article explaining it here. A pitcher can give up hits but it could be because of defensive shifts or ballpark configuration. Things that are generally out of the pitchers control.
-WHIP doesn’t include how many batter they have faced, just innings pitched which can cause one to ask some questions.
-Errors are not included in this stat…which again relates to BABIP.
The Pros:
-Even though the hits can be inflated, it can indicate how efficient a pitcher is with walks, which is on the pitcher without any BABIP issues.
-It may not be the most reliable stat, but the ratio can often accurately match up with a pitcher’s traditional stats. I.E. a pitcher with a high ERA or FIP has a high WHIP because giving up a lot of runs comes from giving up a lot of base runners.
So to put it together, WHIP is a flawed stat no doubt and it would not make it into hardcore saber-metric discussions without it being broken down using BABIP or walk rate. However, it is a stat that one can look at and get a basic idea of how a pitcher keeps runners on or off even if it is inflated or deflated a bit. I don’t think it is worth criticizing someone for looking at WHIP but it is important to bring up the individual stats of it and question its flaws.
Just for fun, what is considered a good or bad WHIP? Well here is a list to give you an idea. (Ratios based on Fangraphs estimation)
Outstanding: Below 1.10
Above Average: 1.25 – 1.10
Average: 1.35-1.26
Mediocre: 1.40-1.45
Bad: 1.50-1.60
Garbage: 1.60 or above